[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hej Lars Vi kan ikke være mere enige i kritikken af winsockx -- i forhold til winsockx foretrækker jeg langt Java. Min pointe var at Java's sockets ikke bragte sockets op på et "højere" niveau end C -- og her mener jeg BSD! Indtil videre foretrækker jeg BSD sockets i C -- men jeg arbejder på et C++ alternativ sanktioneret af BS. Med venlig hilsen Nils Åke Ljunggren "Lars Lerager Hansen" <sslug@sslug> 04-03-02 02:39 Please respond to sslug-cprog To: sslug@sslug cc: Subject: Re: [CPROG] Links til god guide "Nils Åke Ljunggren" <sslug@sslug> wrote: > >Og prøv så lige at lave en lyttende socket i Java og noget tilsvarende i C > >før du siger at Java giver en masse unødvendig kode. > > Her tillader jeg mig at være lodret uenig -- javas socket api er > funktiontionsorienteret api fuldkommen ligesom MFC. MFC? MFC?? Hvad er MFC? M$ foundation classes? 1. Er de ikke kun til C++ og ikke til C? 2. Er dette ikke en Linux-mailliste? 3. Så vidt jeg ved er M$ socket-api endnu mere omstændeligt end Linux's. Nedenstående ligner noget der er løgn: SOCKET WSASocket( int af, int type, int protocol, LPWSAPROTOCOL_INFO lpProtocolInfo, GROUP g, DWORD dwFlags ); Og så kommer denneher bæ: typedef struct _WSAPROTOCOL_INFO { DWORD dwServiceFlags1; DWORD dwServiceFlags2; DWORD dwServiceFlags3; DWORD dwServiceFlags4; DWORD dwProviderFlags; GUID ProviderId; DWORD dwCatalogEntryId; WSAPROTOCOLCHAIN ProtocolChain; int iVersion; int iAddressFamily; int iMaxSockAddr; int iMinSockAddr; int iSocketType; int iProtocol; int iProtocolMaxOffset; int iNetworkByteOrder; int iSecurityScheme; DWORD dwMessageSize; DWORD dwProviderReserved; TCHAR szProtocol[WSAPROTOCOL_LEN+1]; } WSAPROTOCOL_INFO, *LPWSAPROTOCOL_INFO; Sakset fra http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-rt6/ Mvh. Lars
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |