[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"Lars Lerager Hansen" <sslug@sslug> skrev: > Men så er spørgsmålet jo om ikke det er lige så effektivt at benytte > TCP. Hvis man har behov for pålidelig transmission (at alle pakker når frem), men rækkefølgen ikke er vigtig, kan man måske spare lidt ressourcer ved ikke at bruge TCP og så selv implementere retransmission? Jeg kan dog ikke lige komme på et indlysende eksempel hvor man har brug for noget sådan, og hylder bestemt konceptet med at anvende eksisterende komponenter selv om de kun "næsten" er lige det, man har brug for. Anders. -- Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |