[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jeg har lige hentet det seneste snapshot af gcc-30 pakken. De første (mindre) test tyder på at gcc 3.0 (g++) overholder c++ iso-standarden, væsentligt bedre end dens forgænger gcc-2.95. F.eks håndterer den std-namespace korrekt med -fhonor-std (når man bruger STLport istedet for libstdc++). Det er en ting der har irriteret mig. Har nogen benyttet den mere ekstensivt, og har i fundet problemer i forhold til standarden? -- Mvh Lau Sennels
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |